Some General Rules for Spotting a Scam Publisher
* Openly advertises for writers in print or online publications or both.
- The publisher claims that it's seeking to publish first-time authors.
- Openly claims that it's not a vanity or subsidy publisher.
- Claims that it has a new business model that will bring success, but never
explains why successful publishers aren't utilizing it.
- Claims that the established publishers and published writers are trying to
block new writers from being published..
- The publisher gives no or very low advances for books it buys. When it
claims to have given higher advances, it never reveals the names of the authors
who received those higher advances so the publisher's claim can be verified.
- The publisher's books are rarely in any bookstores, particularly the large
chain stores that carry books from just about all reputable commercial
- The publisher's books have never been seen on a bestseller list published by
a reputable source such as the New York Times, especially when said publisher
claims to be large.
- The publisher's books rarely sell more than 5,000 books to readers in
individual purchases and more often fail to reach that number with most of their
books in the double-digits or low triple digits in sales.
- The publisher refuses to release even approximate sales figures for its own
- When confronted with very low or non-existent sales, the publisher refuses
to release the book from contract.
- Books it claims to have published were actually published by another
publisher, now defunct, that used the same business name.
- Its contracts contain provisions that prohibit complaints by its authors
about its service and product.
- Postings in online forums never seem to include anyone who was rejected.
- Online forum criticism is frequently immediately responded to by a defender
of that publisher.
- Acceptances usually take place in less than a month. Even less than a week
is not unusual.
- Acceptance letters tend to be identical when compared with what other
- Contract provisions are specific as to how termination can be invoked, but
the publisher disdains using anything other than some other method of
- Communications from the publisher are frequently unsigned by any individual
using a department address so that no one can be pinned down as responsible for
any comments made to the author.
- The publisher never gives a direct answer to any direct questions. Instead,
the publisher points to others who are satisfied with policy, procedures,
contract, or sales as proof that everything is fine.
- The publisher has a no return policy on its products.
- The publisher regularly offers special discounts to its authors so they can
self-purchase their own books in bulk quantities to resell but fails to offer
regular discounts to the buying public.
- The publisher threatens to blacklist its authors within the industry should
they mention leaving.
- The publisher points out to authors that it's a member of its local BBB.
(The BBB is for consumers. Authors are considered businesses.)
- The publisher doesn't offer its own editing services.
- The publisher states the author doesn't have to buy books and sell them, but
with their business model it's more profitable for the author to do so.
- The publisher places its writers' books on self-publishing sites though the
publisher claimed it offered a "traditional" contract.
- The publishers claims to be a traditional publisher but your ISBN won't be registered until you've sold some quantity of books.
- Openly advertises for writers in print or online publications or both.
- The agency claims that it's open or seeking first-time authors for
- Claims that it has new methodology for gaining access or acceptance with
book publishers, but never explains why successful agencies aren't utilizing it.
- Does not list any sales or refuses to divulge the titles of sales for
- Claims it performs reading and gives recommendations to agencies but does
not list any sales or refuses to divulge the agency names for confidentiality
- The only sales it lists are for vanity or subsidy publishers or the sales it
lists were made by the author before the author signed with the agent, often
years before representation.
- Sales it claims to have made cannot be found listed in any reference lists
of books that were printed by the supposed publisher.
- Sales it made were mostly to a publishing house wholly or partially owned by
- Requires an upfront payment for administration or for a web display or for
later postage and copying.
- Online forum postings never include anyone who was rejected.
- Online forum criticism is frequently responded to by a defender of that
- Representation is usually granted in less than a month or even less than a
- Representation acceptances are usually worded identically.
- The agency name has changed, but the same personnel still work at the same
address and there was no conflict with another agency with the same or a similar
name and no merger to warrant a change.
- The agency never provides original comments from publishers that manuscripts
were allegedly submitted to.
- The agency never provides original invoices or receipts for postage or
copying expenses it claims were made on behalf of the author.
- The agency suggests that it will grant representation if the manuscript is
first given professional editing. Frequently, it will suggest who should do the
editing or offer to make its own in-house editing service available for a
- The agency threatens to blacklist its authors within the industry should
they mention leaving.
- The agency points out to authors that it's a member of its local BBB. (The BBB is for consumers. Authors are considered businesses.)